When it comes to uncovering honest, unbiased feedback, blind communities—also known as unbranded insight communities—can play a role. These research panels are intentionally designed to keep the sponsoring brand anonymous, allowing participants to share their thoughts without the influence of brand recognition, loyalty, or assumptions.
While branded communities are known for their deep engagement and long-term relationships, blind communities serve a different purpose: providing a clean slate for insight generation. This article explores what unbranded communities are, when to use them, and what to consider when deciding between blind and branded research approaches.
Blind communities (or “unbranded communities”) are panels or communities where the sponsoring brand is kept hidden from participants. These are ideal for getting brand-neutral responses—especially when the goal is to evaluate awareness, perception, or competitive positioning.
Unbranded communities can help you explore new markets, reach your competitors' customers, or test concepts without the halo—or baggage—of your brand’s reputation.
In general, the idea behind blind communities is to provide you with more objective feedback or to reach people beyond your current customer base. There’s merit to both of these, but as we explore further below, a blind community is not always the answer.
Because participants don’t know who’s behind the questions, they respond without the filter of brand loyalty or assumptions. This is especially useful for:
Blind communities allow you to go beyond your current customer base. Whether you’re trying to reach Gen Z, B2B decision-makers, or customers shopping with competitors, an unbranded approach gets you in front of fresh perspectives.
While blind insight communities have clear strengths, they’re not without drawbacks. Without a direct brand connection, engagement tends to dip.
Here’s what to watch out for:
Participants in blind communities are less likely to feel emotionally invested. That means response rates may be lower, and you'll likely need to continually recruit new members to maintain a healthy sample size. Alternatively, you may need a huge budget for incentives to keep community members motivated to continue participating.
Because blind communities don’t build long-term relationships, they require constant participant refreshes. Having budget for recruitment should therefore be part of your insight community management plan.
If you have a blind insight community and you’re constantly asking about your brand or your industry, community members may eventually figure out who’s behind the research.
Frequent participants may eventually guess who’s behind the research based on tone, topic, or context—reducing the effectiveness of the blind approach over time.
Finding niche audiences within a blind framework can also be time-consuming and expensive, especially for smaller segments or highly targeted studies.
When research teams talk to us about using our insight community platform, one reason they have for wanting a blind community is the need to reduce bias.
From our decades of experience launching new research communities though, we’re finding that this is not necessarily the case. In fact, in branded environments, people tend to be even more critical and vocal over time. The reason for this is simple: usually your most passionate customers can also be your biggest critics. Just because someone is already a fan or a customer doesn’t mean they won’t be willing to provide constructive feedback. It's usually the opposite: they are more likely to share something constructive since they really care about your brand.
If you need to reach new audiences and consumers for research but find blind communities to be too expensive or cumbersome, there is an alternative: Voice of Market.
Voice of Market connects you with trusted sample providers who deliver fresh, pre-qualified participants every time—no ongoing panel management required. And because Rival’s platform is mobile-first and conversational, participants feel like they’re having a real chat, not slogging through another boring survey.
With this approach, you get the speed, reach, and objectivity of a blind community without the administrative burden. You can test messaging, explore new audiences, and collect brand-agnostic insights—all without losing engagement or quality.
Another reason why some research teams believe they need a blind community is because they don't have their own database of customers. This is typically the case for food and bev or CPG brands, for example, who don't sell directly to their customers.
In general, our approach to recruitment is multi-channel. So not having your own customer database doesn't necessarily preclude you from creating a branded community. Our customer success team has helped many brands tap into social sampling, digital advertising or even sample purchases to build the community.
At the end of the day, choosing between a blind and branded community depends on your objective, budget and brand. For emotional connection, deep insights, and relationship-building, branded communities are unmatched. But if reaching non-customers is super important to you, a blind community or using a solution like Voice of Market is most likely the better solution.
In any case, it’s important to choose a market research platform that is robust and can help you capture quant, qual and video feedback. Mobile-first features, including an option for SMS distribution, can also help you improve engagement regardless of your community type. More crucially, be sure to work with a research supplier that can act like a real partner rather than just another vendor. Support from an awesome customer success team is crucial is crucial to the success of your insights community.
If you’re not sure which approach is right for your research goals, we’re here to help. Let’s talk through the pros and cons in the context of your business and build the best path forward. This is a conversation we love to have—reach out anytime!
Subscribe to our blog to receive new insights on market research trends.
No Comments Yet
Let us know what you think